Policy Wonk

Audits versus community monitoring in Indonesia

Headline result
−8 pp
missing funds with audits; little change from monitoring
RCT
Implemented by
Government of Indonesia (Kecamatan Development Program) with researchers
Type
National government
Where
Indonesia
Region
East Asia & Pacific
When
2003–2004
Evidence
Randomized controlled trial

The challenge

Funds for village road projects were being lost to corruption.

The case

In Indonesian villages building roads with a national development program, researchers randomly raised the chance of a government audit from 4% to 100% in some villages and boosted community participation in monitoring meetings in others. Engineers then estimated how much money was missing. The near-certain audit reduced missing expenditures by about 8 percentage points. Encouraging villagers to monitor had little overall effect, partly because residents had little information and incentive to challenge officials.

Why the results were mixed

Credible top-down audits cut corruption; community monitoring alone did not. Grassroots oversight needs real information and power to work.

Sources