Policy Wonk

Home fire sprinkler mandate: Scottsdale, Arizona

Headline result
$2,166
average loss per sprinklered fire vs. $45,019 unsprinklered (all buildings, 1998–2001)
Observational
Implemented by
City of Scottsdale
Type
City / local government
Where
United States
Region
North America
When
1986–2001
Evidence
Observational / administrative data

The challenge

House fires kill occupants before firefighters can arrive, and fast-growing suburbs stretch fire cover thin.

The case

Scottsdale, Arizona adopted an ordinance requiring fire sprinklers in all new residential construction, in force from January 1, 1986. A 15-year review by the city's fire service found that by then more than half of the city's homes (41,408) were protected. Of 598 home fires over the period, 49 were in single-family homes with sprinklers, and 13 people died in homes without sprinklers. Based on fires from 1998 to 2001 in all types of buildings, not just homes, the average loss was $2,166 per sprinklered fire against $45,019 per unsprinklered fire. Sprinklers also used far less water: about 341 gallons per fire against 2,935 gallons from fire hoses.

Why it worked

Requiring sprinklers only in new buildings kept costs low at the point of construction and let protection build up steadily as the housing stock grew. The death figures are small, but the drop in property losses is large and consistent.

Sources