Policy Wonk

Unite for a Better Life coffee-ceremony sessions: rural Ethiopia

Headline result
0.73
odds of men reporting past-year sexual violence against a partner after the men's programme, relative to control
RCT
Implemented by
J-PAL, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopian Public Health Association and EngenderHealth
Type
NGO / nonprofit
Where
Ethiopia
Region
Sub-Saharan Africa
When
2014–2018
Evidence
Randomized controlled trial

The challenge

In the 2005 WHO multi-country study, Ethiopia reported the highest prevalence of intimate partner violence of any country surveyed, with over 70% of women reporting lifetime physical and/or sexual violence by a partner.

The case

Unite for a Better Life (UBL) is a participatory programme of 14 sessions, delivered twice weekly by trained facilitators in the context of the Ethiopian coffee ceremony, a traditional forum for community discussion, to build skills for healthy, non-violent, equitable relationships. The trial was implemented by J-PAL at MIT with Addis Ababa University's School of Public Health, the Ethiopian Public Health Association and EngenderHealth: 64 villages in four districts of southern Ethiopia were randomly allocated to a control group or to UBL for men, women or couples, covering 6,770 households, and the intervention ran from April to October 2015. About 24 months later, Vandana Sharma and colleagues found no effect of any UBL arm on women's past-year experience of physical or sexual intimate partner violence, the primary outcomes. The men's programme significantly reduced men's self-reported perpetration of past-year sexual violence (adjusted odds ratio 0.73) and was associated with a reduction in women's experience of past-year physical and/or sexual violence (0.81). The programmes for women and couples did not reduce violence but increased reported condom use.

Why the results were mixed

The researchers conclude that the programme 'delivered to men was effective in reducing self-reported perpetration of sexual IPV but did not reduce IPV when delivered to couples or women', and note reliance on self-reported data as the main limitation. A cost analysis put the annualised cost at about US$74 per direct participant.

Sources